Families' Distress Over Shoreline Erosion Endangering Coastal Norfolk Graves
Loved ones of people buried in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion say that a lack of decision over how to tackle the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.
An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards
The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.
A recent report on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.
“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”
Estimates indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.
Haunted by the Past
A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, including its church and graveyard.
“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”
“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”
A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy
Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His mother expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.
“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”
In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”
Seeking Solutions and Certainty
The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.
Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is drawing near.
“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”
A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that process with residents.”
It was also stated there was time to weigh all the options. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”
“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each village.”
The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.